34 Comments

I’ve always liked the symmetry of box joints  and the ability to vary them cleanly has its place.
I like A most here but in a project might prefer another.
Looks good.

i always preferred the box joint over dovetails. i just like the look better. im kinda traditional so A is my choice, but i kinda like the B pattern also.

working with my hands is a joy,it gives me a sense of fulfillment,somthing so many seek and so few find.-SAM MALOOF.

Thanks for replying Ryan. I have always been traditional with box fingers and have always stayed with them being equal and the same. But recently I've seen a few woodworker alternate widths, etc. and I sort of like it. 
I have an idea to try and do inlaid finger joints. Never seen this done. 
I know Pottz.... it kind of plays on you doesn't it? Perhaps I'll draw up a few concepts in SketchUp first. Then pop out on the saw. 
I have an Incra jig for the router table that I use for box joints.   One I have used a few times is a staggered joint.   i.e. short, long, short, long etc.    I like the traditional type A but with the depth of the cut equal to the width.  

Ron

Hi Rick

All of them are functional. I like variety, so using any of them will give a same size box different looks, and that way it keeps them fresh, win with a sound joint, win with a different look, Win win. :-)
Thx Ron.... that would be attractive. Reminds me sort of like a houndstooth dovetail. I'll try the equal depth equal width too. 
A configuration that I like is where there is a 2:1 or 3:2 ratio between the 2 boards. You could even do a 3:1 ratio.    The actual ratio isn't important -- just that the fingers on one board are visibly wider than the other.  That sort of gives you a look like dovetails but with simpler finger joints.   I've also done a fat one in the middle, and have them get smaller after each pair of fingers.  For example 5:4:3:2:1 or 4:3:2, depending upon how wide and how many fingers.  

--Nathan, TX. Hire the lazy man. He may not do as much work but that's because he will find a better way.

That's interesting Lazyman! Could you post a photo of this here? Would love to see it. 
Not sure I have any pictures.  I will have to look.  

--Nathan, TX. Hire the lazy man. He may not do as much work but that's because he will find a better way.

What do you think of these?
Here is one, though it’s not as obvious on this scale.  I think it is about a 3:2 and the outside fingers are a little smaller to finish off the width. In hindsight a 4:2 ratio might have been better on this one.  A bigger difference makes it stand out better. 


BTW, this is a chest that sits under my lathe for my turning tools.  

--Nathan, TX. Hire the lazy man. He may not do as much work but that's because he will find a better way.

I like it Lazyman! Nice portions.
yeah that looks good !

working with my hands is a joy,it gives me a sense of fulfillment,somthing so many seek and so few find.-SAM MALOOF.

i like D but not so pronounced. more G&G style.

working with my hands is a joy,it gives me a sense of fulfillment,somthing so many seek and so few find.-SAM MALOOF.

Pottz....It's the curve I like. 
on the right project it would be a cool look.

working with my hands is a joy,it gives me a sense of fulfillment,somthing so many seek and so few find.-SAM MALOOF.

D looks too much like it is made with Lincoln Logs.  Not crazy about E either.  

--Nathan, TX. Hire the lazy man. He may not do as much work but that's because he will find a better way.

More from -